Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions
Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions
Blog Article
Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.
101 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it can be easy for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to dispose of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has arrived at to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has arrived at these stage. Read more
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, selling a more informed and just society.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons acquiring their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to do away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive piece of legislation that defines several criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for the people found guilty.
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
six. Mere involvement in a heinous offence isn't any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for your concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering the fact that then He's driving the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more required for further investigation, therefore, his continuous incarceration would not serve any valuable purpose at this stage.
Online access towards the case management system to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases might be searched using name or case number.
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
When the employee case law management fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were perfectly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to offer an extensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were perfectly aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.